How do we fix 288751?

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 12:00 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> 
> We have a choice of where that code lives, and the degree of polish
> here somewhat depends on whether we expect people to call it.  It
> could be in reconcile, in pack, or in a special plugin.  If it was in
> pack, for instance, then if the server detects it, it could
> communicate to the client that it should repack itself without the
> smart verb.

This sounds like a it-will-fix-itself-gradually approach, which I like.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20081112/288d9dd8/attachment.pgp