Is this right?

[Russel Winder]

On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:54 +0100, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
[ . . . ]
> 
>     Stephen> Yes ... my point is that if the publisher does it
>     Stephen> right, and bazaar supports doing it right, the
>     Stephen> subscribers need do *nothing*.
> 
> We agree on the general case then.

It seems then that Bazaar is not doing the right thing just now, but is
behaving like a 1995 appliocation?

Sounds like there is an "New Feature" request in here.  If 2008
technology can automate the task for subscribers and not doing this is
1995 technology then I'd rather Bazaar used 2008 thinking and not 1995
thinking.

-- 
Russel.
====================================================
Dr Russel Winder                 Partner

Concertant LLP                   t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
41 Buckmaster Road,              f: +44 8700 516 084
London SW11 1EN, UK.             m: +44 7770 465 077
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20081106/5e70a621/attachment.pgp