Bazaar 1.9 rc1-2 Windows installers

[Enrique Ramirez]

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:
> According to MSDN error 193 means "file is not a valid Win32 application".
> IIUC installer have been built on 64-bit platform, so I guess there is
> Win32/Win64 mismatch.

Interesting.

Googling around I stumbled upon this c++ source that supposedly can
tell between different types of executables:
http://www.novell.com/communities/node/4804/determining-architecture-type-windows-binary-file

Compiled and ran it against both QT dll's (QtGui4.dll and QtCore4.dll)
and they both check out as being I386 binaries.

I'm not sure how reliable this code is, but I hope this helps figure
out why the odd behavior.

PS: I'm still inclined to say it could have been a corruption error on
transfer or on compress. The QtCore4.dll shows its version number when
you mouse over it (4.4.1.0) while QtGui4.dll doesn't.

// --------------------------------------
Enrique Ramirez Irizarry
Lead Developer
Indie Code Labs
http://www.indiecodelabs.com



> Eugene Wee пишет:
>> Unfortunately, it appears that QBzr is not working even when the default
>> plugins option is selected. It is installed (under "C:\Program
>> Files\Bazaar\plugins", not under the user's application data directory
>> any more, correct?), but an attempt to run bzr qlog produces the error
>> message dialog:
>> "The application or DLL C:\Program Files\Bazaar\lib\QtGui4.dll is not a
>> valid Windows image. Please check this against your installation diskette."
>>
>> At the command line itself, the error message is:
>> "bzr: ERROR: exceptions.ImportError: DLL load failed with error code 193
>

>
>
>