RFC 'bzr-next'

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:35 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> 
> It seems to me that what's happening there is some of the merges are
> done by people who would not otherwise be involved in development, so
> it's scaling up the problem and the effort.  This would clearly be a
> win if someone not currently involved in development decides to both
> run the tool and look into any merge or test failures.  If it's people
> who are working on bzr redirecting their efforts then I think it's
> more questionable, and I'd rather get each individual thing merged
> into bzr.dev more quickly and then merged out from there.

Not all things can be merged more quickly; sufficient maturity to be
merged is not always a fast thing to achieve; I'd like to know that
things that do take time to put together and integrate cleanly are
working will with other such things.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20081013/c4d2872f/attachment.pgp