[RFC] Change to use 'merge_sort' for per-file-log

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:44 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
> So if I had my choice, I would probably explicitly flag the revisions
> that are
> only there because they merged the change closer to the branch
> mainline.

That would be nice if you want to do that.

> I will note when talking with Guilhem (Guilheim?) about MySQL, that he
> is
> concerned they have too many intermediate branches, and that the merge
> nodes
> will become too noisy. (5.0-xxx => 5.0 => 5.1-int => 5.1 => 6.0, etc)
> So I would consider having a flag for it. But we can cross that when
> people
> decide it is important.

Agreed.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080925/fc7408f2/attachment.pgp