Bzr plugins *must* die!

[Forest Bond]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:00:15PM -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Forest Bond wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 02:27:09PM -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> >> Specifically, I use 2 branches rather than N. 1 branch at
> >> ~bzr/bzrtools/packaging-dapper because dapper has a different set of
> >> requirements. (python-central versus python-support).
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> I've been doing the same for bzr-svn (which doesn't have a ~dapper package,
> >> because we start with the debian packaging, and it wasn't packaged until after
> >> debian stopped using python-central.)
> > 
> > I can't find any documentation regarding these distro shifts to/from
> > python-central/python-support.  Do you have a link?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Forest
> 
> A google search of:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=python-central+python-support
> 
> gives
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy
> and
> http://help.lockergnome.com/linux/central-support-ftopict355948.html
> 
> Basically, dapper uses python-central for managing python packages, and edgy+
> uses python-support. I don't know where that corresponds in terms of debian
> releases.

My Google skills are as good as they've always been.  Perhaps my reading skills
are suffering.

I thought (and don't see any reason to think differently after having scanned
the links you posted) that both python-central and python-support were being
used due to lack of consensus as to which was preferable?  Am I misunderstanding
things?

Thanks,
Forest
-- 
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
http://www.pytagsfs.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080924/7986e426/attachment.pgp