Branch fails from 'pack-0.92' repo to 'rich-root-pack' repo

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ben Finney wrote:
> Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:
> 
>> Ben Finney wrote:
>>> Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> This week, I hope to work on a format similar to rich-root-pack
>>>> that *will* be a suitable default. As part of that work, I will
>>>> be ensuring that all branches, even weird ones like BE, can be
>>>> converted into that format.
>>> How is this work going?
>> Mostly done and merged.
>>
>>> Is it incorporated into the work in Bazaar 1.6?
>> No, it went into 1.5
> 
> Okay.
> 
> What is the format called?

There is no new format.

> Is it now "a suitable default", as you discussed earlier? What are the
> requirements for it to become the default?

I think so, Robert thinks not.

> Would I be well advised to convert any repositories to this format?

No.

> What caveats are there for using it?

It will cause confusion.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFItNoS0F+nu1YWqI0RAp77AJ4u5z0oPhtosX+1UmOSz+UM9GYXCQCdEZf/
RMzGmPnbRkt5GcTLLiVcF3g=
=hPPX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----