Bugs with rich-root-packs
bialix at ukr.net
Thu Mar 20 04:34:10 GMT 2008
Aaron Bentley пишет:
> John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>> I don't know that these are release blocking bugs, as I would guess this
>> isn't a
>> regression. It *is* something that needs to be fixed before we make rich
>> roots a
>> default. (Which was discussed at the sprint, at least a --pack-1.3 which is
>> rich-root-pack with a couple small updates.)
> Yeah, it's looking more like --pack1.4 at this point. I need to hash
> out the disgreements me and Robert have a bit more.
> rich-root-pack is never going to be a default format, so I think it's
> okay if we release 1.3 with the inability to convert the Bazaar source
> tree to it.
If you mean that subtree will be next default format then I should say that rich-root
bug present and in conversion to subtrees.
More information about the bazaar