[MERGE] improve documentation of send/merge relationship

[Peter Schuller]

> What about just using 'location' ? I don't really care, though I think
> "BRANCH_OR_MERGE_DIRECTIVE" is starting to get pretty long.

I agree it's long.

Personally I have to say I would prefer "source" over "location", in
spite of the possible confusion with source code. The reason being
that "source" feels just general enough while still being spot on. It
conveys the fact that it is where something is being obtained *from*
(as opposed to e.g. the target repository of the merge). It is also
consistent with the currently proposed text, which says "The source of
the merge can be specified....".

Obviously a trivial fix. I'll resubmit with whatever is preferred by
you.

-- 
/ Peter Schuller

PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080316/43f4f0ce/attachment.pgp