[MERGE][Bug #64783] Fixing check to understand the split-up .bzr format

[Daniel Mark Watkins]

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com> wrote:
> You seem to be removing the check.check() api?  That should at least
> be documented, or better yet left behind and deprecated.
Done.

> _get_elements() is useful, though seems like it should be in a more 
> general location.  Doesn't info do (or need) something very similar? 
> And I am not so sure it should be checking the paths against '.' in 
> particular.  If this is factored out it could be tested.
Done, as bzrdir.open_containing_tree_branch_or_repository.  info can't
really use the API, but it seems like it could be generally useful so
I've left it on bzrdir.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: check.3.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 36142 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080314/14c5f0f7/attachment-0001.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080314/14c5f0f7/attachment-0001.pgp