[MERGE] Don't ask a password if there is no real terminal. (#69851)

[Erik Bågfors]

No branch at that URL.

bzr branch http://jdwilkins.co.uk/bzr/Textmate.tmbundle
bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "http://jdwilkins.co.uk/bzr/Textmate.tmbundle/".

/Erik

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Jeremy Wilkins <jeb at jdwilkins.co.uk> wrote:
> Yep,
>
>  cd ~
>  cd Library/Application Support/TextMate/Bundles
>  bzr branch http://jdwilkins.co.uk/bzr/Textmate.tmbundle
>
>  Theres a wiki page on it at http://bazaar-vcs.org/TextMateBundle
>
>  It works but needs some polish - knowledge was gained as I went along
>  and some parts need updating with what i now know and things like the
>  UIFactory need using everywhere, not just for branching. Only
>  significant missing feature is Merge.
>
>  Its fallen by the wayside the last few months. I was hellishly busy
>  with a Rails app in work, then was away in NZ for a month, hopefully
>  over the next month or so I'm going to get it into some sort of shape
>  for inclusion in the TextMate svn repo. It hasn't helped that I've not
>  got the bzr-svn stuff going on my mac in work so I'm not actually
>  using myself.
>
>  jeb
>
>
>
>  On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Being a TextMate fan, is this something you can let me look at? :)
>  >
>  >  /Erik
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Jeremy Wilkins <jeb at jdwilkins.co.uk> wrote:
>  >  > Must admit I'm not following this but I've got a different UIFactory
>  >  >  for the (rather crude) TextMate integration - hence bzr will run
>  >  >  without a terminal but can still ask for a password (uses
>  >  >  cocoadialog).
>  >  >
>  >  >  Presumably this shouldn't break that?
>  >  >
>  >  >  jeb
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:40 AM, James Westby <jw+debian at jameswestby.net> wrote:
>  >  >  > On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 06:29 +0200, Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>  >  >  >  > I'm thinking about testing, but I fear such test could hang selftest waiting
>  >  >  >  > for user infinitely (as it doing now). Theoretically I could launch
>  >  >  >  > it as subprocess and kill subprocess after 5-10 seconds if it hangs, but
>  >  >  >  > unfortunately os.kill absent on Windows.
>  >  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  Yeah, that's a danger, but it should only strike if the test is
>  >  >  >  failing shouldn't it?
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  I agree that it would be undesirable though.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  Thanks,
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  James
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>