ACLTransport and Other ACL Thoughts

[Erik Bågfors]

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:
> John Arbash Meinel пишет:
>
> >
>  > Well, it is fairly fundamental in Bazaar. For a variety of reasons. (One
>  > of the
>  > oddities in SVN is that you can commit a tree, but when you check it out
>  > at the
>  > same revision, it will be different because someone changed things in
>  > files that
>  > you didn't modify.) We have been trying to introduce NestedTrees to
>  > bring back a
>  > little bit of flexibility. It starts to create boundaries where all the
>  > data in
>  > *this* subset will stay consistent, but doesn't have to stay consistent
>  > with
>  > *that*, while still allowing you to get everything with a single
>  > "checkout".
>
>  I never works with svn professionally or heavily (I'm actually made jump
>  TortoiseCVS -> bzr, so I skip svn at all) so I'm always confused by this
>  statement. Do I understand correctly that if project has 2 files
>  (foo.c and bar.c) then 2 developers could:
>
>  svn co project
>
>  Then 1st developer hacks foo.c and other hacks bar.c.
>  Then both developer do commit without update and it succeed?
>
>  Am I understand correctly?


Yes, that's exactly how svn works. Basically, what you check in, might
never have existed on any developers machine.

/Erik