doc/developers vs doc/en/developer-guide/

[Alexander Belchenko]

Robert Collins пишет:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:47 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>> Robert Collins wrote:
>>> Can we nuke the latter?
>> I'd rather not. It's there so that all of the core docs have a
>> consistent location in the generated doc tree, namely
>>
>>   language-code/doc-name/.
>>
>> I believe quite a few developers/users are looking to translate the core
>> docs to other languages and I'd like to see the Developer Guide included
>> in that.
> 
> the en/developers-guide directory is empty. If its empty it is at best
> confusing for folk looking in the source. Either we should remove the en
> one, which does not impact your generated doc tree; or we should use it
> and not use doc/developers.

It's empty in sources but not empty in distribution. During `make docs` step
our HAKING.txt is copied to this folder and corresponding html generated.