doc/developers vs doc/en/developer-guide/

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:47 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > Can we nuke the latter?
> 
> I'd rather not. It's there so that all of the core docs have a
> consistent location in the generated doc tree, namely
> 
>   language-code/doc-name/.
> 
> I believe quite a few developers/users are looking to translate the core
> docs to other languages and I'd like to see the Developer Guide included
> in that.

the en/developers-guide directory is empty. If its empty it is at best
confusing for folk looking in the source. Either we should remove the en
one, which does not impact your generated doc tree; or we should use it
and not use doc/developers.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080219/5ff12ebf/attachment.pgp