Gitk for Bzr?

[Andrew Cowie]

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:12 +0100, Per Jonsson wrote:
> Still it's the only reason why I haven't switched to Bzr yet.


On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:38 +0100, Daniel Schierbeck wrote:
> No, using scrollbars would avoid resizing,

So, combined with a command line switch that gives the user what they
want, it doesn't hurt anyone.

> A good interface should be simple and pretty, in accordance with
> the HIG.

As Robert points out, our evangelism of good human-machine interface
does not imply that the UI musn't do the job requested of it.

More to the point, it tends to boil down to not cluttering the user
interface with additional controls that just confuse people and for
which a sensible default can be chosen.

Adding a command line option to change the behaviour of the displayed
commit messages would give the power to the user while not adding
additional clutter to the user interface.


On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 09:06 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> Can I suggest 'bzr viz -vv'.

-v -v tends to mean "even more verbose" in many systems and not
infrequently has debugging connotations. 

`bzr diff -c` already exists and seems to imply the right thing, so I
might encourage you to consider using -c for `viz`.

AfC
Sydney
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080118/109bafe1/attachment.pgp