Revisions referencing unchanged files

Robert Collins robertc at
Wed Jan 9 05:57:56 GMT 2008

On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 05:01 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> I'm assured that our current inventory has no sane way of representing
> such a condition.  ISTM that this is desirable data to be stored, and
> so should be stuffed in the capability list for future incarnations.
> But perhaps there's another better way to keep it around?

The inventory can, but there's no way to tell commit that you want to
force a change marker, and reconcile is likely to just revert the extra
change because there's no way to infer it should have happened. So we
need to make at least two changes to make this do the right thing.

GPG key available at: <>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : 

More information about the bazaar mailing list