0.18: checking removes files automatically?

[Martin Pool]

On 8/17/07, Jari Aalto <jari.aalto at cante.net> wrote:
> I'd rather not see stopping an error (and make program stop), but only a
> message like:
>
>     missing FILENAME (but versioned)
>
> while the program continues to process rest of the items.
>
> With --strict, the stop on error would be okay.

Ok.  And how should they be recorded?  As removed, or in the state
they had in the previous tree?

-- 
Martin