Doc review & quick ref card - anyone with some DTP skills?

[Ian Clatworthy]

Sabin Iacob wrote:

Others could well disagree but here's my 2c ...

> P.S. here is what I was thinking about including:
> creating:
> bzr init
> bzr branch (worth mentioning aliases?)
> bzr checkout

I wouldn't mention the aliases of branch here.

> information:
> bzr status
> bzr diff
> bzr log
> bzr inventory
> bzr missing

I'd leave out inventory. Perhaps add info and cat though?

> commit:
> bzr commit
> bzr uncommit
> bzr revert
> bzr update

Not sure I'd put update here in this bunch? Maybe in the next set ...

> merging:
> bzr pull
> bzr merge

Maybe resolve as well?

> publishing:
> bzr push
> bzr bundle
> bzr export?

Yes to export. FWIW, the preferred name for bundle in 0.19 will be 'submit'.

> also, some general use recipes would probably be nice (maybe
> "svn-style", "git-style", "whatever-style" next to each other? some
> usage patterns from the wiki?)
> 

I'd like to see a separate quick reference card for Recipes. Many of the
interesting recipes are likely to mention commands (init-repo) or
details (http ok for pull but sftp for push, commit required after
merge) that may not make it onto the Usage one.

We need 'add' and 'remove' in there somewhere as well IMO.

Otherwise, sounds good!

Ian C.