aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Thu Jul 19 15:43:09 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 09:35 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>> The reason for this class is to **avoid** removing support support for
>>> unlistable transports as a precondition of pack based repositories.
>> That would be tragic, since pack-based formats will make plain http much
> I feel like you're missing the point or I'm not being clear or
I'm saying that your passing comment strikes me as wrong. I don't think
we *do* want to drop support for dumb http in the future, though I can
see that disabling for particular repositories would a good tradeoff for
users who want lockless support.
> I'm *not* dropping support. I'm doing what you want - keeping http
> working with this format regardless of listability.
Yes, this discussion has almost nothing to do with your patch. It's
about the comment in it.
> Are you happy with the branch?
Yes. The FakeNFS removal was the only serious problem I saw with it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar