[MERGE] Unit tests for win32 glob expansion
John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Thu Jul 19 00:15:17 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Kuno Meyer wrote:
> And once again, this time hopefully without any stupid errors...
The only thing I would make a comment on, is that we haven't been using Feature
to represent platform specific limitations.
I'm not sure what to think just yet....
Specifically, I was considering that on our PQM test bot should cause tests to
fail if they are missing a feature, which would help ensure that all tests are
I know Martin is looking into having more error classes for 'failing' tests.
We have both:
And his thread of "[rfc] add more possible test results".
This would seem like a TestPlatformLimit according to his email. More than
I at least think of Features as mostly "DependencyMissing".
However, I guess we could extend the test infrastructure, so that a given
feature could indicate what error subclass it was.
Certainly, one of the documented possible Features was Symlinks, and that is a
Platform limitation, not a missing dependency.
So +1 from me, modulo a discussion on the list about how we want to handle
Features that cannot be fulfilled.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar