[MERGE] left align log output if it only contains merge revisions

[Kent Gibson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Martin Pool wrote:
> On 7/7/07, John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
>> John Arbash Meinel has voted +1 (conditional).
>> As for flushing left or not... I'm starting to lean more into the
>> 'it is
>> wasting space on the left', rather than specific significance for
>> mainline revs. The dotted revnos would probably make it clear, and
>> this
>> only actually takes effect when you are obviously displaying a merged
>> branch.
>
> I haven't read the code yet - it looks like it has been sufficiently
> reviewed at a technical level, but people just aren't sure if it's a
> good idea or not.  If it would be useful for me to read it, I will.
>
> If we are stuck, my casting vote is for what John says here - that
> showing them indented is a waste of space, but/and they should have
> the dotted revnos if from the point of view of this branch they are
> not mainline.
>
Just in case it isn't clear - they do have dotted revnos.
John's comment relates to whether the dotted revnos are sufficient to
highlight that they are not mainline revisions.

Cheers,
Kent.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGnMtggoxTFTi1P8QRAoAwAJ4okGpjvTa99pU9ukUgv7u+zrpeAACg+qRo
jhvpyd0DSjfhyQkwydw4pBw=
=c11E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----