[RFC] fetch-ghosts command?

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:42 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:

> > > I'd suggest instead making it fetch --ghosts as someone wanted a
> > > different fetch command the other day.
> >
> > Sure. What command did they want?
> 
> It came up during https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125249 -- I would
> imagine that fetch would bring in all the new revisions from another
> branch, but not put them onto a branch or update a tree.  It wouldn't
> try to fill ghosts unless --ghosts was specified.  Just an idea.

I don't know about a plain 'fetch' command - when combined with gc it
seems odd to me. I thought Aaron was using shorthand for the library api
which is indeed 'fetch'. Anyhow, I'm happy to have 'fetch --ghosts'.

-rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070713/7c5c084d/attachment.pgp