marrying bundle and directive? (Re: [MERGE] Merge directive format 2, Bundle format 4)

[Erik Bågfors]

On 7/2/07, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> On 7/2/07, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
> > I think it makes sense to have a single command for the baseline
> > functionality.  We may also want additional commands that make specific
> > usages easier.  As an example supplemental command, "bzr send" might
> > create a merge directive, then create a new message in my mail client,
> > with the directive as an attachment.
>
> Maybe this should just be called 'bzr send' - after all the main thing
> you will want to do with the file that's produced is to send it
> somewhere else.  I think it would be ok to have it either be able to
> send mail directly itself, or invoke your mail client if you have one
> configured.  But I do think it should probably default to just
> producing a file, not sending it, and maybe that makes the name
> inappropriate.
>

I think darcs uses send, and I don't think that's caused any problems for them.
Also, I think submit might be quite good.

/Erik