marrying bundle and directive? (Re: [MERGE] Merge directive format 2, Bundle format 4)

[Martin Pool]

On 7/2/07, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I think it makes sense to have a single command for the baseline
> functionality.  We may also want additional commands that make specific
> usages easier.  As an example supplemental command, "bzr send" might
> create a merge directive, then create a new message in my mail client,
> with the directive as an attachment.

Maybe this should just be called 'bzr send' - after all the main thing
you will want to do with the file that's produced is to send it
somewhere else.  I think it would be ok to have it either be able to
send mail directly itself, or invoke your mail client if you have one
configured.  But I do think it should probably default to just
producing a file, not sending it, and maybe that makes the name
inappropriate.

-- 
Martin