pyrex .c versioning...

John Arbash Meinel john at arbash-meinel.com
Wed May 30 13:53:30 BST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:16 +0200, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> It is still a bit under discussion whether to include the .c files in
>> source control. My feeling is that you shouldn't version generated
>> files. There are times when it would be nice (one of our benchmark
>> machines doesn't have pyrex installed yet). But overall I think not
>> versioning them is the better plan. 
> 
> Is it churn or conflicts that concerns you most ?
> 
> -Rob

Well both are problematic, but churn is probably more of an issue to me.

I've always been of the mind that you shouldn't version auto-generated
things.

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGXXPKJdeBCYSNAAMRAvBxAKCjdv5xL35L8oz13eO7l/RRmtVoGgCeLbSD
D3oOLY7QjVPIv9edE0tinWM=
=uL2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bazaar mailing list