pyrex .c versioning...
John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Wed May 30 13:53:30 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:16 +0200, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> It is still a bit under discussion whether to include the .c files in
>> source control. My feeling is that you shouldn't version generated
>> files. There are times when it would be nice (one of our benchmark
>> machines doesn't have pyrex installed yet). But overall I think not
>> versioning them is the better plan.
>
> Is it churn or conflicts that concerns you most ?
>
> -Rob
Well both are problematic, but churn is probably more of an issue to me.
I've always been of the mind that you shouldn't version auto-generated
things.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGXXPKJdeBCYSNAAMRAvBxAKCjdv5xL35L8oz13eO7l/RRmtVoGgCeLbSD
D3oOLY7QjVPIv9edE0tinWM=
=uL2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list