[RFC] 0.17 themes and objectives

John Arbash Meinel john at arbash-meinel.com
Wed May 23 21:10:35 BST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> Hi,
> 

...

> I'd therefore like to openly ask contributors about what they hope to
> land for 0.17. I'm happy for 0.17 to simply be a faster and better
> quality 0.16 if there are key issues addressed. I'm also happy for it to
> be more than that if time and risk permits.
> 
> Please speak up and let me know what you'd like to see 0.17 be and what
> time you need to realise those objectives.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian C.


Any regressions found should be merged. I know of 1 dirstate patch that
I have pending, and Bug #110279 also looks like an important regression
to fix. (you can't merge a branch if you delete something that they
renamed).

I've been trying to triage bugs, and it would be good to squash
everything with >= High importance.

I would like to get the _iter_changes stuff merged.

I would like us to decide whether we want to include pyrex code or not.
If we decide to include it, I have a few branches that would be nice to
merge. (They need a bit of cleanup to conform to what I think Robert and
I have agreed is a good way to do it).

I may have more, but that is what I've thought of today.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGVJ+6JdeBCYSNAAMRAr62AJ0bZ64h9kt/8rLJn+w88O6wvtzXGQCgpWmb
HJxH6JDV6Jom/sLamE3Hp6A=
=yc77
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bazaar mailing list