What's up with plugins and 0.15?

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>>> "bzr-gtk" should be renamed to "gtk" and "pqm-submit" should be
>>> renamed to "pqm".  (I don't know what bzr-tags or update-mirrors
>>> should be). 

>> Not all of them care what their specific name is. So you can just use
>> "tags" or "update_mirrors". 

> All of these are things are branches made from their homes.
> Renaming my directories made all the complaints go away,
> so indeed none of the ones I have cared about the name.

Actually, recent versions of bzr-gtk require that it be named gtk.

> Seems a little obscure, though (and now I have to learn
> new "spellings" for a few things I've been using for ages).

No command names are affected, so you shouldn't need to use the new
names very often.

> I'm expecting people will go to the plugins page, do the
> branch using the link provided, and then get funky errors.
> Should plugin authors be renaming stuff now?

I think they should.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGE/KA0F+nu1YWqI0RAtL4AJ9jhc1IRmbHns5FPIwDp7HsGZC8ogCeNTHI
TmWvt7DznXWxXE9ZCX5bkzw=
=YqTh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----