[RFC] tweak to voting rules

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aaron Bentley wrote:
> I think we need to differentiate between two reasons for voting against
> a patch:
> 1. This implementation needs work before we can accept it.
> 2. This patch is a bad idea, and we should never accept it, even if
> well-implemented.
> 
> So I propose we change things slightly:
> -1 : patch needs work
> -2 : patch is a bad idea
> 
> That will allow BB to categorize the -1 patches differently from the -2
> patches, and still get the patches off the pending list, where they
> really don't belong.
> 
> I suppose while we were at it, we could also change the positive end of
> the scale:
> 
> +1 : submittable, if you make certain changes
> +2 : submittable
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Aaron

I personally think it is reasonable. Though I would also be okay with
fractions (-1, -0.5, -0, +0, +0.5, +1)

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFc3pzJdeBCYSNAAMRAsVdAJ9+y6N4NK64uStPwb51edUaVjiH8ACcDMhw
GMM59gYc4kXB5LYiOdiscGs=
=vF2e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----