[RFC] tweak to voting rules

[Kent Gibson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Kent Gibson wrote:
>>> Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>>>> If you look at the vetoed requests, only two of them were
>>>>> rejected on the grounds that they were bad ideas.  Most of
>>>>> the rejections were due to implementation issues or because
>>>>> an email was incorrectly flagged as a merge request.
>>> That maybe ok for -1, but how about all the +1s out there?
>
> All of the +1s migrate to +2, all the +1conditionals become +1.
>
I understand that.  My initial point was that you were redefining -1.
I agree that the -1 change is a close call.

What I was trying to point out here is that you've definitely
redefined +1.
I'd like to retain the meaning of +1 for backward compatibility with
both BB and the mailing list.

Cheers,
Kent.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFb3TBgoxTFTi1P8QRAsW+AKDSUOQprP1mtcNruLxEtE+y5KveWACfUIMO
D3d5SdhDBjXUp5PHhtio/Ss=
=DUZt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----