[RFC] tweak to voting rules

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kent Gibson wrote:
> Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>> If you look at the vetoed requests, only two of them were rejected
>>> on the grounds that they were bad ideas.  Most of the rejections
>>> were due to implementation issues or because an email was
>>> incorrectly flagged as a merge request.
> That maybe ok for -1, but how about all the +1s out there?

All of the +1s migrate to +2, all the +1conditionals become +1.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFbyjR0F+nu1YWqI0RAr84AJ9qDvDVhZ+1g58NVmvKFm1H7tiIYgCghHbX
e6EGniFyl96p38cDB4WL4fU=
=HLN5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----