Push after commit --local

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 07:48 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> 
> I'd say that commit could push the local commits if there are some,
> _and_ commit the local changes on top of that. But having commit do a
> push, I also find it weird. For me, "commit" creates a new revision in
> any case. 

Agreed - commit should always make a new revision.

Having it push the existing revisions first might be nice, but that
still wont solve the 'I have stuff to push and nothing to commit' use
case here.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060927/df316d22/attachment.pgp