Push after commit --local
robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Sep 27 01:43:06 BST 2006
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 07:48 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> I'd say that commit could push the local commits if there are some,
> _and_ commit the local changes on top of that. But having commit do a
> push, I also find it weird. For me, "commit" creates a new revision in
> any case.
Agreed - commit should always make a new revision.
Having it push the existing revisions first might be nice, but that
still wont solve the 'I have stuff to push and nothing to commit' use
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060927/df316d22/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar