[MERGE] Deprecate last-revision and pending_merges.

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Thu Sep 7 23:56:09 BST 2006

On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:49 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> > I feel quite strongly that the following combination is OK:
> >  * the implicit root tree has no parents.
> >  * last_revision/basis_revision/basis_tree on the implicit root
> throws
> >  * a new WorkingTree has a basis which is the implicit root
> I think that combination would be good - safe, but also simple in the
> common case.  So are you OK to leave last_revision as is until those
> changes are in place? 

Yes. I think my point was that I'd rather leave last_revision as is
until we can do basis_revision as i describe above, rather than brining
in basis_revision which is no better than last_revision.

I'll remove the deprecation for last_revision, but not pending_merges -
does that have everyones agreement ?

GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060908/7a4c5f38/attachment.pgp 

More information about the bazaar mailing list