[RFC] remove last-revision and pending-merge separation within the core code.

[Martin Pool]

On 15 Aug 2006, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:38 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> > 
> > As we discussed, I think having it turn into a pull is wrong, and
> > I'd rather it just error.  I don't think it's such a major case that
> > it needs to be specifically supported.  On the other hand it seems
> > like we could, at some point in the future, allow for the 'origin
> > tree' revision to be put into the list. 
> 
> I'm ok with it erroring. My question is - do you require that I add
> explicit code to error, or is it ok to just have it degrade in the short
> term ? I agree we can support the use case with the low level changes
> I'm proposing in the future if desired.

I don't insist on it.  I'd suggest at least having a TODO comment.

-- 
Martin