[PATCH] Fix installation of tests.intertree_implementations
mbp at canonical.com
Tue Aug 1 05:26:02 BST 2006
On 1 Aug 2006, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> It would be nice to catch it earlier. Running no tests should be a
> relatively fast test to run. And it avoids the question of packaging the
> wrong things as you mention.
It's possible there are modules which aren't actually loaded until the
tests are *run* rather than loaded, if they go through some kind of
dynamic registration. I don't know any code is actually in that
category at the moment.
More information about the bazaar