[RFC] intertree-implementations

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 08:12 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 15:36 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >> Otherwise +1 from me.
> > 
> > So there is a little of that smell. However, lets look at what it really
> > does:
> > we have two trees that we want to test an operation between. They might
> > be:
> > WorkingTreeFormat2, RevisionTree
> > or
> > WorkingTreeFormat2, WorkingTreeFormat4
> > or 
> > WorkingTreeFormat2, WorkingTreeFormat2
> > 
> > so it was really about finding a good way to make the generative logic
> > only be written once, but let getting a tree be quite straight forward.
> > I'm happy to tweak if folk feel there are more obvious ways to do it.
> > 
> > Rob
> > 
> 
> Yeah, I realized you were using a working tree to generate a tree of
> another type (like RevisionTree).
> 
> I find it a little ugly, but I don't know of anything better.
> 
> So it seems like this is approved for 0.10, if you can hold off until we
> get 0.9 out the door.

Its currently blocked pending agreement with Aaron on the
tree_implementations patch - I want to be sure we're not making things
harder for the nested trees work.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060728/d2543c68/attachment.pgp