John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Thu Jul 27 14:12:29 BST 2006
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 15:36 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> Otherwise +1 from me.
> So there is a little of that smell. However, lets look at what it really
> we have two trees that we want to test an operation between. They might
> WorkingTreeFormat2, RevisionTree
> WorkingTreeFormat2, WorkingTreeFormat4
> WorkingTreeFormat2, WorkingTreeFormat2
> so it was really about finding a good way to make the generative logic
> only be written once, but let getting a tree be quite straight forward.
> I'm happy to tweak if folk feel there are more obvious ways to do it.
Yeah, I realized you were using a working tree to generate a tree of
another type (like RevisionTree).
I find it a little ugly, but I don't know of anything better.
So it seems like this is approved for 0.10, if you can hold off until we
get 0.9 out the door.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060727/fe716dbf/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar