pre-commit hooks and $Id$ banners?

[Jamie Wilkinson]

This one time, at band camp, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 23:43 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
>
>> Sure it's pedantic, but it's a necessary part of QA and software engineering
>> to be able to accurately describe the source code at any discreet point in
>> time.
>
>What if time turns out to be continuous? 

Irrelevant either way; bzr revisions are discreet points on a branch.  A
point in time along the branch timeline will always refer to a single
revision.

But this is orthogonal to my argument; the VCS should not change the code;
alreayd this thread is exploring the difficulty in storing these CVS turds,
expanding them, checking for ones that haven't changed; it's a lot of work
for no gain, IMHO.

-1 to the "feature".