[RFC] init-repo take --tree option

[James Blackwell]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:17:37AM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> James Blackwell wrote:
> > I'd prefer --trees as the with in '--with-trees' doesn't seem to impart
> > additional useful information. 
> 
> When I see "--trees", I think "Well, what about trees?"  Options like
> "--format" or "--lightweight" seem to describe the output in a way that
> "--trees" doesn't, and "--with-trees" does.
> 
> We talk about "format 5 branches", or "lightweight checkouts", but I'd
> say "repository with trees", not "tree repository" or "trees repository".
> 
> But like I say, not a deal breaker either way.

Blue shed! Red! Blue! Red!

Yeah. I don't think it matters much either. 



-- 
My home page:   <a href="http://jblack.linuxguru.net">James Blackwell</a>
Gnupg 06357400  F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060328/a6ca7426/attachment.pgp