uncommitted changes in rsync and branch of bzr.dev

Wouter van Heyst larstiq at larstiq.dyndns.org
Mon Mar 6 04:28:50 GMT 2006


On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:24:28PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> >Try a bzr revert. As far as I known, pushing switched from rsync to
> >sftp, and now the working tree does not get updated anymore. It would be
> >clearer if that just got deleted. (That, or working tree pushing with
> >sftp implemented).
> 
> I wouldn't have expected the second branch:
> 
>  bzr branch bzr.dev bzr.dev.1
>  cd bzr.dev.1
>  bzr status
> 
> to also show the same output: does a local branch just copy the working
> tree instead of doing the equivalent of bzr revert?

Currently, yes. There has been some mild disagreement with this, see the
'A couple of bugs...' thread for instance. 

Wouter van Heyst




More information about the bazaar mailing list