[jblack: Re: [tools-discuss] Evaluation notes on bzr-0.7]

Aaron Bentley aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Wed Mar 1 21:09:35 GMT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

James Blackwell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:23:24PM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> 
>>I think that we can make it convenient.  For example, we can have an
>>inotify daemon that runs 'bzr edit' on every file that we modify.
>>Fundamentally, it doesn't make sense to me that we have to tell the tool
>>which files changed, because the OS must already know.
> 
> 
> -1 on this concept. This would require documentation for installation on
> how to install inotify daemons for any platform that we want to support
> Bazaar-NG users on.

That's a strawman.  I never proposed that either the 'bk edit' model or
the inotify daemon be mandatory.

If you want great performance on huge freakin' trees, users are going to
have to do more work.  Either they:
1. specify particular files at the commandline every time
2. run 'bzr edit' on file they edit
3. teach their tools to run 'bzr edit'
4. set up a daemon to run 'bzr edit'.

> I've personally had problems with both gam and fam rendering my system
> unusably unstable enough that deinstallation was necessary to in order to
> perform basic work tasks.

So you can use option 1, 2 or 3, then.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEBg2P0F+nu1YWqI0RAv7XAJ0YxGB3r1AYMgNR1Gy3NhZNpkllCQCfTIed
H6VqTGrNzi9Z0wvl1IHGZOA=
=zZpl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the bazaar mailing list