Voting foo as PQM policy? [was: attn folk doing reviews.]

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Pool wrote:
| On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 23:23 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:

|>It might be nice if the PQM policy for bzr allowed anyone to submit
|>merges.  The merges would be logged.  They could generate emails to
|>committers.  They could also update a tracking page.
|>
|>However, they would only be processed if the required votes were
submitted.
|
|
| I think that would be nice too.  It overlaps a bit with the idea of a
| review-support tool discussed a while ago, and I added a link here

Yes, I was inspired by your review interface.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD+cAf0F+nu1YWqI0RAudmAJ4oHCb4yLAgjCQRHD/+Zsx2FWbHxACeP6Qp
+PBqRxAY0vBN1YvnLEQYlYk=
=HrAT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----