Voting foo as PQM policy? [was: attn folk doing reviews.]

[Martin Pool]

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 23:23 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:

> Review interface as pqm policy
> ==============================
> It might be nice if the PQM policy for bzr allowed anyone to submit
> merges.  The merges would be logged.  They could generate emails to
> committers.  They could also update a tracking page.
> 
> However, they would only be processed if the required votes were submitted.

I think that would be nice too.  It overlaps a bit with the idea of a
review-support tool discussed a while ago, and I added a link here

  http://bazaar.canonical.com/ReviewInterface

-- 
Martin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060220/c0b2ef1c/attachment.pgp