[RFC] cryptographic signatures - compared to monotone?

[Robert Collins]

On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:50 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
> 
> One problem is that libgpgme can't be used with gpg wrappers like
> gnome-gpg, since it is hard coded to call gpg.
> 
> Also, it will call gpg with pipes as stdin/stdout as bzr is now, so
> you are likely to see the same problems.  I don't think it makes sense
> to try and work around this bug in bzr, since gpg-agent/pinentry are
> still classed as beta software.  It would make a lot more sense to fix
> the problem at source.

Yeah. For baz I used gpgme solely for checking policy, and gpg or a
wrapper as the user configured for signing.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060218/069de645/attachment.pgp