going with init-repo for now

[James Blackwell]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:37:18PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> Just a note, I'm going to go with 'init-repo' as the command for now on
> the following rationale:
> 
>  Martin is ok with it as a starting point, though sub commands might be
> better in the long run. (bzr repository create for instance).
> 
>  Like create-repository it will be a top level and visible command.
> 
>  It made sense to use 'init' as a prefix as we use 'init' for a very
> similar thing already.

I'm happy with that. I would have gone with "init --repo" and "init
--branch" with "init --branch" being the default. Was this considered?

-- 
My home page:   <a href="http://jblack.linuxguru.net">James Blackwell</a>
Gnupg 06357400  F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060214/39843091/attachment.pgp