Is bzr *appropriate* and *ready* for me?

[James Blackwell]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:26:41PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> >> I'm not even sure where would be the centralized push be in bzr case?
> >> Can someone explain how to accomplish similar "star system"?
> >> 
> >>            \ | /
> >>           -  o  -
> >>            / | \
> >> 
> >> Jari 
> >
> > Yes, right now, you do have to run "bzr push" after "bzr commit" to put
> > them in a central location. But you can just have a branch located on a
> > shared access machine, that different people push to.

The CMS projects out here in Vancouver think this is a feature and a
not-insignificant part of the appeal.

It gives a great mix between centralization and decentralization. Everyone
can work locally, with commits, and push to a common place when the code
is good enough. All the benetis of decentralization, without breaking the
mind of centralized people.

-- 
My home page:   <a href="http://jblack.linuxguru.net">James Blackwell</a>
Gnupg 06357400  F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060208/f803bbc2/attachment.pgp