Is bzr *appropriate* and *ready* for me?

[Erik Bågfors]

> OK, I'll give this scheme a try. Are there any tricks about the docs?
> This troubles me a bit. I am weird in the sense L *like* to RTFMs, and I
> feel there's no much for bzr. Maybe I am missing something. I had a look
> at the wiki maily. Also, bzr is not self-documented atm, is it? At least
> I miss a few things, where do I look for the rest? Here?. Last, but not
> least, what version should I start with. I ave 0.7 now, but it's marked
> as a development version.
> Many, many thanks for your advice,

0.7 is a development release, I assume all releases up to 2.0 will be
(there will be no 1.0, it will be 2.0 at once, since baz was 1.0). 
Use 0.7 for now.

Documentation is mostly on the wiki. It may not be perfect at all
times since things are still in development but it should be a start.

As for self documentation. What are you missing? Do tell.

Some pointers:
bzr help  <-- basic commands
bzr help commands <-- list all commands
bzr help <command> <-- gives help about a specific command ("bzr help
init" for example)
bzr <command> --help <-- same as above. ("bzr init --help" for example)

Regards,
Erik - going to bed....