Is bzr *appropriate* and *ready* for me?

[jorges]

On 05/02/06 21:28, Erik Bågfors wrote:
> I would have one branch on a central server some where, this can be
> your dsl machine, then on both your home machine(s) and your uni
> machine(s), you get that branch, you hack on it and then push your
> changes to the central branch.  So... for example
> 
> Home,
> * hack hack
> * commit
> * hack hack
> * commit
> * push
> 
> Uni
> * pull
> * hack hack
> * commit
> * hack hack
> * commit
> * push
> 
> Home
> * pull
> * hack hack
> * commit
> * push
> 
> etc
> 
> Don't worry if you forget to push or pull some time, that's what merge
> is here for.
> 
> 
OK, I'll give this scheme a try. Are there any tricks about the docs? 
This troubles me a bit. I am weird in the sense L *like* to RTFMs, and I 
feel there's no much for bzr. Maybe I am missing something. I had a look 
at the wiki maily. Also, bzr is not self-documented atm, is it? At least 
I miss a few things, where do I look for the rest? Here?. Last, but not 
least, what version should I start with. I ave 0.7 now, but it's marked 
as a development version.
Many, many thanks for your advice,

jorges