current key TODO's [my opinion only)

[Martin Pool]

On  2 Feb 2006, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 09:42 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> 
> > > When I looked into it, I found that it wasn't easy to fix. The problem
> > > was that the code that knew what was going on during merging (whether
> > > the bit was going to be changed or not) only 'recorded' that information
> > > by modifying the file. Which is where you and I discussed having the
> > > apply_changeset code actually modify a Tree object, rather than doing
> > > the modifications directly to the filesystem only.
> > 
> > That would be my preference, yes.  I did it the ugly way in Tree
> > Transform, since there isn't a corresponding function on WorkingTree to
> > set the executible bit.
> 
> Would it help to have that ? Either as a chmod or as an explicit
> set_executable(file_id)  ?

That sounds good to me.

-- 
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060202/7587a9a2/attachment.pgp