new status output

Jan Hudec bulb at ucw.cz
Wed Oct 19 08:37:22 BST 2005


On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 17:14:36 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 19/10/05, Jan Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz> wrote:
> 
> > My problem with this is, that IMHO the single letters are faster to read
> > and easier to spot anomalies. Ie. it's quite fast to scan a list of 'M's
> > for 'C', while it's slower to scan a list of 'modified's for
> > 'conflict's.
> 
> But for myself, it seems even easier to have them grouped by state and
> see whether the "conflicts:" header is present at all.  Do you
> disagree?

Sounds good.

There should probably still be an option for machine-readable output,
which I'd prefer to be stateless, ie. repeating the stat flag for each
file, but per-type grouping sounds good for human-readable one.

-- 
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051019/ed1d00e5/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list