new status output

[Martin Pool]

On 19/10/05, Jan Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz> wrote:

> My problem with this is, that IMHO the single letters are faster to read
> and easier to spot anomalies. Ie. it's quite fast to scan a list of 'M's
> for 'C', while it's slower to scan a list of 'modified's for
> 'conflict's.

But for myself, it seems even easier to have them grouped by state and
see whether the "conflicts:" header is present at all.  Do you
disagree?

--
Martin